Frequently Asked Questions

Firstly, you and your (ex) partner would need to arrange a property settlement, in terms of orders by consent, or a Financial Agreement.  This is the document that the bank needs to see, to show them that you have binding and enforceable terms relating to the transfer of title and payment of money, and also so they can see that you will qualify for the exemption of stamp duty.

It is not a ‘letter from a lawyer’, but documents that both parties have signed off on, and made in final and binding terms.  The stamp duty exemption on transfers of property between separated couples only applies if there is evidence of family court orders made, or a Financial Agreement entered into between the parties.

Secondly, you take the finalised consent orders or Financial Agreement to the bank, and arrange for the settlement of the transfer of title and payment in exchange.  That part is basically a conveyancing process, just as if you were selling a house, except that the parties are you and your ex partner, and the ‘contract’ is the family law agreement reached between you.

To start the process, we suggest you start with an consultation where we can review the details of your settlement, and explain these procedures in more detail. Then we are able to advise you about the costs and steps involved in drawing up terms of settlement, which would be sent to your ex partner, for them to review  with their own solicitor.   If agreed, they then would then have to sign the terms and return them for you to sign.

No. In many cases, parties reach an agreement without the assistance of the court. There are alternatives to commencing proceedings in court and these include mediation, conciliation, counselling and conferencing.

However, it is important that any agreement is properly formalised, and that you give thought to what details should be included in the agreement, and what areas are likely to give rise to possible conflict in the future, so we can include provisions about all these matters.

Yes, you can apply to the Court for both Interim and Final Parenting Orders following separation and if you both agree, the Court can make Orders by consent to formalise the situation.

A common question that arises is – ‘do I have to apply for parenting orders?’  Often people have an outdated understanding of family law, as in years gone by, a custody order would be made as a matter of course, typically at the time of divorce, giving all parental rights to one parent (often the mother) over the other parent.  The law has changed substantially over the years, and the current Family Law Act is a long way from these attitudes.

These days, family law does not require parents to apply for orders, and actively discourages legal proceedings, except in cases of risk to a child, or urgency if a child has been removed.  The law directs parties into mediation before applying to the court.  

If you are worried that a parent may try to abduct a child, you need advice on how to prevent this, and what legal action you can take for recovery if that occurs.

Yes. You can resolve your family property matters after separation by agreement, either in the form of Consent Orders or a Financial Agreement.

This can, and commonly does, occur before a divorce application is made. Divorce only arises for married couples.  You can apply for a divorce after 12 months of separation, but you do not need to apply.  Many separated couples never obtain a divorce.

If you can resolve matters by consent, you do not need to apply to the court. However, if you cannot reach an agreement, your time for filing an application to the court for property adjustment orders will expire – in the case of married couples, 12 months after a final divorce order is made, and in the case of de facto couples, 2 years after the relationship broke down.

Each case is different and is determined by its own facts. The Court will determine the property division based on contributions (financial and non-financial, including homemaking contributions), across the whole relationship (before, during and post-separation).  The court will then also consider the future financial resources and future needs of both parties, and also the overall justice and fairness of a property adjustment in all the circumstances.

The court then gives weight to these contributions and the particular facts and circumstances of the relationship, and decides on a fair proportion of property adjustment between the parties, in light of these factors.

However, the court may not necessarily make an adjustment at all – for example, in cases of a short relationship, or where contributions were significant on one side and minimal on the other side.

Disputes can arise on specific aspects of each case, or there can be a wide number of issues in dispute.   Your lawyer can assist by identifying the issues in dispute, and prioritising these issues, and how they fit into settlement options.

Some issues in dispute can be factual – for example, the value of an asset (which can be resolved by obtaining an independent expert valuation), or whether an asset exists (which can be resolved by ‘discovery’ and financial disclosure procedures, with or without court action).  

Some aspects of the dispute can be legal issues – for example, as to the weight that would be given to certain contributions in the particular facts of the case, or whether an asset should be included or excluded from the asset pool (and here the parties will need to be guided by legal advice as to likely court outcomes, based on earlier court judgements).

While the Principal Solicitor, Lee Galloway, has an extensive background in legal aid work for many years (as former head of the Family Law Section of the Legal Aid Office ACT, and former Executive Officer for National Legal Aid), in private practice, we do not do legal aid, as we are a private law firm.

You do not have to take any specific legal steps.  

However, we find that people find reassurance by discussing their concerns with a solicitor, to learn about options for settlement and ways through the typical issues that arise on separation.  

You are in a better position to make decisions and to keep conflict under control, if you understand your rights, obligations and entitlements.

If there is a fear that one party may remove the child from the other, or if the child has actually been removed, an urgent kind of parenting order (called a ‘recovery order’) can be obtained from the Court to prevent the child from being taken away, to have the child returned or to locate the child. This is important if there is a possibility that the child may be taken overseas.

At Galloway Family Law we are highly skilled and can respond quickly in these situations, due to our familiarity and specialization in these court procedures.

Under the Family Law Act 1975, both parents automatically have rights and obligations to make major decisions affecting a child’s long-term care, welfare and development.  This is called ‘parental responsibility’.  

It deals with issues such as the child’s long-term education (such as decisions about school enrolment), and health (such as having a surgical procedure).

Both parents are obligated under the Act to consult with each other about these matters and to make decisions jointly.  This obligation does not need a court order, and the court is not necessarily involved in these matters unless specific orders are sought about parental responsibility or aspects of it. 

The court’s primary objective is to make parenting orders that are in the best interests of the children, despite the apparent conflict with the wishes or the interests of either of the parents or children.

The court can make a wide range of parenting orders, including orders about ‘parental responsibility’, or whom a child lives with, or what time they spend with a parent.

If a court makes a ‘live with’ or ‘time spent’ order, it does not affect other responsibilities that parents have in making decisions about children including medical, dental and educational matters.

On the other hand, if an order is made for a child to live with or spend time with a parent, that parent can make all day to day decisions concerning the child that are necessary for their care of the child, without needing to consult with the other parent (for example, decisions about the child’s bedtime, and food, or how they spend their day).  Also, the family law act provides that no one can interfere with a parent’s time with a child, or prevent the child from living with or spending time with that parent under the terms of a court order.

Parenting laws state that the welfare of the child is of paramount importance. If both parties cannot agree, a Judge will make a decision after considering all the relevant factors. In some cases the Court can require that the children be separately represented by their own solicitor.

In most cases, even after a court case has commenced, parents will reach consent and finalise the case by way of consent orders. This will often occur based on recommendations of court experts, including family consultants following the issue of a report or memorandum. In those cases, the court will still consider if the proposed consent orders are in the child’s interests, but will usually make the orders sought by consent.  Orders made by consent are legally binding and enforceable, just as if the case had been decided by a Judge following a defended hearing.

By law, both parents are required to support their child financially. In some cases this may involve one parent paying a child support payment to the other, to help with the costs of raising a child.

Child support laws in Australia allow for children with separated parents to be covered by the Child Support scheme, administered by the Child Support Agency. The scheme uses a formula, based on the income of both parents, the costs of raising children, the number of dependent children that each parent has, the number of children covered by the assessment, and the proportion of care that each parent provides for the children.

There are a number of steps that can be taken to dispute child support payments.

In some cases, the proper remedy is to lodge an objection to the Agency.  There are time limits applying to objections, which you should note carefully in the letter setting out the Agency’s decision or assessment.

In other cases, if a parent believes the current child support payments are unfair, he or she can apply to the Child Support Agency (or in some limited cases, directly to the court) for a change of assessment review in ‘special circumstances’.

There are a number of specific and limited grounds for seeking a change of assessment – including:

• that the parent has significant personal expenses or commitments (such as loan repayments) which affect their capacity to pay child support at the assessed rate, or
• the child has significant costs of their care or training or education (such as private school fees), or
• the parent has high costs of child care, or
• the parent has high costs of contact travel, or
• the parent has a commitment to maintain a step-child
• the other parent has income or assets or financial resources that are not properly reflected in the child support assessment.

If the Agency makes a decision which again is not favourable to the parent, further steps can be taken to have that decision reviewed.

Changing child support decisions can be complex.  We have significant experience in child support matters, both through court action and CSA procedures, and can assist you to navigate these matters.